|
- A moral dilemma.
- There was an interesting story on The Choice on BBC Radio 4 yesterday. There was Barbara Harris a woman that started to adopt the new babies of her drug addicted neighbour who already had 4 kids. After a number of years her charity work has evolved and now she runs a charity which pays drug addicted and alcoholic women to take long term contraception or sterilisation. Of course this is terribly controversial as it's close to eugenics especially since most of the addicts are black, but the outcome does appear to be better both for the addicts and their would be children. 100s of children that would have grown up in terrible lives just haven't been born. (her organisation, Project Prevention, has so far made payments to over 3,000 women.)
- The racism critics are silenced by the fact that the woman's own children are all half black as she married a black man and upto their deaths her racist parents wouln't speak to her.
- Drug use is a victimless crime ...but only if you don't have kids ..then users are negligent in caring for their kids . If uses don't stop taking drugs right after they get pregnant then they are child abusers .. So the state has the duy to step in and protect the kid...but surely it's better to prevent a crime before it happens ? So yes you are infringing a drug users human rights if you try to stop them get pregnant, but you are just stopping them commiting a certain crime. It should be a crime to have unprotected sex whilst addicted to drugs
-
The latest thing in the States is a large poster Saying "Endangered species followed by a picture of a cute black baby ..."Then saying "Stop abortion now"
- cos statistically speaking a large proportion of aborted babies are black as black women are more likely to have unplanned pregnancies so the Anti-abortion mob are able to spin abortion as eugenics against black people .... I don't think it's actually really true that this means that the black abortion rate is so high that the black population is falling in real terms
|